Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Sanford v. Kirst
as 24-30282
Plaintiff:
Jeffry L. Sanford, Individually, and on behalf of his minor son, Joseph Sanford
Defendant:
Joshua Kirst, H. Allen and City of Baton Rouge
Haywood v. Texas Realtor
as 23-11240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tianikwa Haywood and Paul-Douglas Celestine
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Realtor, Ceo or Owner, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C. Law Firm, Sanford & Kurland, Owner of Pennymac Loan Services, L.L.C. and others
Sumrall Capital v. Miller
as 23-60121
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Sumrall Capital, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellant:
Sanford Miller
Counter Defendant:
U-Save Holdings, Incorporated, Trace Residential Properties, L.L.C. and Thomas P. McDonnell, III
USA v. Williams
as 22-10316
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Howard Sanford Williams
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bamdad v. Rivera
as 21-40571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Masoud Bamdad
Defendant / Appellee:
Rivera, Warden, FCI-Beaumont, Rivera J. Cline, Warden, T. Fazekos and others
In re: Taxotere Prod Liability
as 20-30517
Defendant / Appellee:
Hospira Worldwide, L.L.C., formerly known as Hospira Worldwide, Incorporated and Hospira, Incorporated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dora Sanford
Billy Sanford v. City of Fort Worth, Texas, et al
as 19-11385
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS and CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILLY R. SANFORD
USA v. Bobbie Sandford
as 19-60759
Defendant / Appellant:
BOBBIE LOUIS SANDFORD, also known as Bobby Louis Sandford, also known as Bobby Lewis Sanford, also known as Bobby Sanford, also known as Bobby Louis Sanford
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sanford Pulley v. Grounds Effect Landscaping, et al
as 19-50872
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN LANDSCAPING, INCORPORATED, THERESA BALL, GROUNDS EFFECT LANDSCAPING and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANFORD T. PULLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
