Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Indigenous Peoples v. U.S. Army Corps
as 23-40555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Indigenous Peoples of the Coastal Bend, Karankawa Kadla Tribe of the Texas Gulf Coast and Ingleside on the Bay Coastal Watch Association
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Scott A. Spellmon, Lieutenant General, Christopher G. Beck, Brigadier General and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MODA Ingleside Oil Terminal, L.L.C. and Enbridge Ingleside Oil Terminal, LLC, formerly known as MODA Ingleside Oil Terminal, L.L.C.
Bayou City v. US Army Corps
as 22-40770
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bayou City Waterkeeper
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Lieutenant General Scott A. Spellmon, in his official capacity as Chief and Commander of Engineers, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Colonel Timothy R. Vail, in his official capacity as District Engineer, Galveston District, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Shrimpers v. United States Army Corps
as 21-60889
Petitioner:
Shrimpers and Fishermen of the RGV, Sierra Club and Save RGV from LNG
Respondent:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Colonel Timothy R. Vail, in his official capacity as Galveston District Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Robert W. Heinly, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief, Regulatory Division, Galveston District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilder Perez-Vail v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-60462
Petitioner:
WILDER RODRIGO PEREZ-VAIL
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. James Vail
as 17-30710
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES VAIL
Estate of James McLean v. High Frequency Active Aurora, et al
as 16-20045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICKI FANNING MCLEAN
Defendant - Appellee:
HIGH FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURORA RESEARCH PROGRAM, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
