Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tapps v. McClendon et al
as 2:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Frances Tapps
Defendant:
Randolph McClendon, Hum Management, LLC and Joseph P. Lopinto, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2020cv02873
Defendant:
Larry Reech, Unidentified Parties, Joseph Lopinto, III and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Isaiah Evans, Ratrell Hill and Dantriel Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cangelosi v. Randolph Sheppard Vendors of La et al
as 2:2020cv02060
Plaintiff:
Clayton Cangelosi
Defendant:
Randolph Sheppard Vendors of La and Azalea Bingo Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12841
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv11861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Neil v. Randolph et al
as 2:2009cv06242
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Neil
Defendant:
Charlotte Randolph, Lafourche Parish, Lafourche Parish Department of Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bush et al v. Lafourche Parish Council et al
as 2:2009cv03436
Plaintiff:
Sally Bush and Courtney Bush
Defendant:
Lafourche Parish Council, Charlotte Randolph, Craig Webre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Death)
Montgomery v. Louisiana State Board of Appeals et al
as 2:2008cv03877
Plaintiff:
Randolph Montgomery
Defendant:
Louisiana State Board of Appeals and Windsor Court Hotel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.