Cases 121 - 130 of 7,736
Roe v. Russell et al
as 2:2023cv06982
Plaintiff:
Comelius Antwine Roe and Cornelius Antwine Roe
Defendant:
Jay Russell and Stacie Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges
as 2:2023cv06243
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges, Fredericka Homberg Wicker, Susan M Chehardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. USA
as 2:2023cv07207
Petitioner:
Alonzo Pittman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act
Parker v. Gore et al
as 2:2023cv06838
Plaintiff:
Marlowe E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Doctor Gore, Doctor Ham and St. Tammany Parish Jail Doctors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joiner v. Lewis et al
as 2:2023cv07144
Plaintiff:
John Joiner
Defendant:
Taylor Lewis, Chance Cloud, Dr. Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Consolidated Government Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05928
Plaintiff:
Melvin Junis Allen
Defendant:
Consolidated Government Inc., EMT Billiot and Unidentified Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bolden v. Bommery et al
as 2:2023cv05726
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bolden
Defendant:
Janorris Bommery
Respondent:
Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dyer v. North
as 2:2023cv07092
Plaintiff:
Lester R Dyer, III
Defendant:
Michael B. North
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
