Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Williams et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Peter James Williams and Alfreda Rodney Williams
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wade v. Louisiana State, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00726
Defendant:
EFCU Federal Financial Credit Union/State Entity, United States of America USA, Inc., Jon Ann Giblin and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00608
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00296
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth B. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Thomas William Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00796
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dempster v. Dept. of Veteran Affairs et al
as 3:2016cv00774
Plaintiff:
Jon A. Dempster
Defendant:
Dept. of Veteran Affairs and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tubesing v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00641
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Tubesing
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Drake v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
