Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Scott v. Cupp
as 3:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Wynston Scott
Defendant:
A Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Long
as 6:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Dwight A Alexander, Sr
Defendant:
Brandon Scott Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crosby v. Day
as 5:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Crosby
Defendant:
Travis Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Emanuel et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
JerXavier L Lane
Defendant:
Leon Emanuel, Charles Rex Scott, Paul D Carmouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs v. Edwards
as 1:2022cv06072
Plaintiff:
Clay Landis Riggs
Defendant:
Tony Edwards, Warden Book, Asst Warden Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv05408
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph West and Douglas Mark West
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, Regional Director Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. Prator et al
as 5:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Dennis Ray Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Steven Prator, Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Rickey Fraiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rougeau v. Edwards et al
as 1:2022cv01340
Plaintiff:
Brandon Rougeau
Defendant:
Tony Edwards, Warden Scott, Nurse Robins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ma'at
as 2:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Smith
Defendant:
S Ma'at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Darbonne v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Darbonne and Jeffery Scott Darbonne
Defendant:
Samuel Johnson, James Longino, Donovan Dupuy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
