Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Sullivan v. Chesapeake Louisiana L P
as 5:2009cv00579
Defendant:
Chesapeake Louisiana L P
Plaintiff:
Richard Joseph Sullivan
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ryan et al v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
as 2:2008cv01788
Plaintiff:
Damon Ryan, Larry Scott, Amy Simien and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sullivan v. Merck & Co Inc
as 5:2008cv01712
Plaintiff:
Sue Sullivan
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Champagne et al v. Devon Energy Production Co L P et al
as 6:2008cv01562
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane Carol Champagne, Robert E Trahan, Annette Trahan Leblanc and others
Defendant:
Devon Energy Production Co L P, Chevron Corporation, Hilcorp Energy Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Miller v. Sullivan, et al
as 2:2008cv01274
Defendant:
United Financial Casualty Co, Sullivan Welding L L C, Charles Andrew Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell R Miller
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wing v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 2:2008cv00951
Plaintiff:
Betty C Wing, Cheryl Roesch Rodrigue, Houston Adley Estate and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc Corp Grantor Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Sullivan v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2007cv01973
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Sullivan
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Amos et al v. Bayer CropScience L P et al
as 3:2007cv01373
Plaintiff:
Aaron Amos, Aaron Amos, A I M Inc and others
Defendant:
Bayer A G, Bayer CropScience A G, Bayer CropScience Holding Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
