Cases 61 - 70 of 211
Pierce v. Sparkman et al
as 1:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Epps et al
as 2:2012cv00184
Petitioner:
William Lynn Jackson
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corley v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00088
Petitioner:
Randy Scott Corley
Respondent:
Christopher Epps, Lora Cole, Jerry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell - DO NOT FILE v. Epps et al
as 2:2012mc00002
Plaintiff:
Kevin Russell - DO NOT FILE
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkmen, Brewer and others
Tomlin v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Tomlin
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Gloria Perry, Lorenzo Cabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckner v. Williams et al
as 4:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Gerard Douglas Buckner
Defendant:
Stanley Williams, Willie Bays, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Henry, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Faye Noel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardwell v. McCleave et al
as 3:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Glen Cardwell
Defendant:
McCleave, Wanda Collier, Ronda Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Crawford
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. MDOC et al
as 4:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Ray
Defendant:
MDOC, Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
