Cases 101 - 110 of 487
Bass v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bass
Respondent:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gaskin v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Gaskin
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Woodall and Woodland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearron v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Khristoffer Mandell Hearron
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, E.L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torns v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00264
Plaintiff:
Romain Shontay Torns
Defendant:
State of Mississippi , Parole Board Chairmain, Board Members and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibbs v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gibbs
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Ron Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Steele et al
as 4:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
Merlin Dancey Hill
Defendant:
Unknown Steele, Frank Shaw, F. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Steele et al
as 3:2013cv01017
Defendant:
Unknown Steele , Frank Shaw , F. Ovalle and others
Plaintiff:
Merlin Dancey Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00078
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Nigel McClain
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
States v. Epps
as 3:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. States
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
