Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Terrell v. Copiah County, Ms et al
as 3:2011cv00714
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Terrell
Defendant:
Copiah County, Ms, Edna E. Stevens and Steve Amos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amos v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00261
Plaintiff:
Julius Amos
Defendant:
Western Express, Inc. and John Doe Defendants 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Amos v. USA
as 3:2011cv00234
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marks Amos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Taite v. Pearson
as 5:2010cv00154
Plaintiff:
Darrell Amos Taite
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Smith v. Epps
as 3:2008cv00147
Plaintiff:
Amos F. Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Akings et al v. Wayne Farms, LLC
as 2:2007cv01003
Plaintiff:
Amos Akings, Amos Akings, Mary Ann Allums and others
Defendant:
Wayne Farms, LLC and Wayne Farms, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2007cv00077
Plaintiff:
Amos C. Smith and Michelle Drane Smith
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and others
Movant:
David Haddock, David Haddock and Lecky King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Andrews, et al v. Clark Sand & Co., et al
as 2:2003cv00293
Plaintiff:
Mervin Andrews, Jr., Charles Fortenberry, Larry Sparkman and others
Defendant:
Clark Sand & Co., Sherwin-Williams Company, Vulcan Materials Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
