Cases 91 - 100 of 9,351
Wilson v. Director
as 5:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Kristopher Wilson
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Traylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Tony Traylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Gregory Marshall Hill
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rector, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Rector, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McWilliam v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Donald McWilliam
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duvall v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Steven Lee Duvall
Respondent:
State Of Texas and Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miles v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Larry Miles
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Hillhouse
as 6:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Eron Demond Anderson
Respondent:
Botie Hillhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cavett v. Collier
as 6:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
