General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 61 - 70 of 9,446
Carr v. TDCJ-ID
as 2:2024cv00626
Defendant: TDCJ-ID
Petitioner: Willie Tyrone Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendez-Mendoza v. FCI-Victorville One
as 4:2024cv00700
Respondent: FCI-Victorville One
Petitioner: Alonso Mendez-Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00693
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Reginald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duran v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 4:2024cv00617
Respondent: Director TDCJ - CID
Petitioner: David Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00147
Petitioner: Christopher Long
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bracken v. Warden, FCI McDowell
as 1:2024cv00277
Petitioner: John Fitzgerald Bracken
Respondent: Warden, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sills v. Warden, Texarkana FCI
as 5:2024cv00107
Respondent: Warden, Texarkana FCI
Petitioner: Robert Sills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bell v. Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00273
Petitioner: Marcus L Bell
Respondent: Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. USA
as 4:2024cv00632
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Nnenna Mary Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00303
Respondent: Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Petitioner: Gerald Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?