Cases 61 - 70 of 11,087
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal and Correctional Officer FNU Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Bi-State Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Carlisle Washington
Defendant:
Bi-State Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Binion v. Pod Moving & Storage et al
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Seth Binion
Defendant:
Pods Moving & Storage, McKinney P.D., Collin County Criminal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service
as 6:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Ross v. Risperdaul
as 9:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ryan Clark Ross
Defendant:
Risperdaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frankenfield v. Galveston County et al
as 9:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Galveston County, Greg Russel and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolfford v. Ivey et al
as 9:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
Ronald Ivey, Sonnia Navarrete, Randi Furbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kindred v. Texas Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Defendant:
Texas Parole Board, Temple, Texas Parole Office and Field Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Payne et al
as 9:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
James Alan Burke, Jr.
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
