Labor Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,090
Aghatise v. ROYAL GUARDS SOLUTION LLC
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff: Ighadaro Aghatise
Defendant: ROYAL GUARDS SOLUTION LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tittle v. Colony Cabinets, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff: Christi Tittle
Defendant: Colony Cabinets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hare v. Spencer Fane LLP
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff: Mr. Jaspal Singh Hare and Jaspal Singh Hare
Defendant: Spence Fane LLP and Spencer Fane LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Colbert v. Downhole Chemical Solutions, LLC
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: Joe Colbert
Defendant: Downhole Chemical Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hinojos v. Reliant Rehabilitation Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: Kalleigh Hinojos
Defendant: Reliant Rehabilitation Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cartee v. BBK Business, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff: Sara Cartee
Defendant: BBK Business, LLC, Bijaya Bhusal and Dirga Kandel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lamey v. Boingo Wireless, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff: Beth Lamey
Defendant: Boingo Wireless, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Flores v. Western States Metal Roofing
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff: Juanita Flores
Defendant: WESTERN STATES METAL ROOFING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
R&L Carriers, Inc. v. George
as 4:2024cv00140
Plaintiff: R&L Carriers, Inc.
Defendant: Mark George
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Crisp v. Bron & Claude Engineering, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: Michael Dail Crisp
Defendant: Bron & Claude Engineering, LLC and Bronson Burke

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?