Cases 31 - 40 of 329
Ramos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00148
Plaintiff:
Roel Ramos
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Young et al
as 1:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and K Young
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ricky Denton
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden of USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClinton et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00003
Plaintiff:
Kenosha McClinton and Jacques Miranda
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, BMM and Beaumont Medium Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Looper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv00546
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Carroll Ellis Hayes, Dallas B Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Delores Looper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. John v. Bureau of Prisons Director et al
as 5:2020cv00195
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Director, FNU Hawkins, Warden S. Salmonson and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dale St. John
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv00477
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Shultz
Plaintiff:
Ricky Denton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00361
Plaintiff:
Silas Harris
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childs v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden Beaumont Low
Plaintiff:
Jason Wayne Childs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsee v. Federal Bureau of Prisons - Beaumont
as 1:2020cv00329
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Pierre Parsee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
