Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Butcher v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Charles I. Butler and Charles E. Butcher, II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butcher v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
Lester Thomas Butcher
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Defendant:
Bryan Williams, Joanie Fontenot, Jared O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent v. Gibson et al
as 9:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Anitra Lindley, Matthew Ruble, Robert J Posvar and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Vincent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Collier et al
as 9:2020cv00196
Defendant:
Robert Grant, Brian Collier, Michael Butcher and others
Plaintiff:
Jason J Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balderrama v. Davis et al
as 9:2020cv00115
Defendant:
Unknown Butcher, Unknown Gipson and Lorie Davis
Plaintiff:
Christopher Balderrama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daigle v. Perez et al
as 9:2020cv00095
Defendant:
Patrick Cutsinger, A Stephenson, FNU Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mark Daigle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jorge et al v. Davis et al
as 9:2020cv00094
Defendant:
Unknown Butcher, Unknown Gipson and Lorie Davis
Plaintiff:
Mayorga Jorge and Christopher Balderrama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv00180
Defendant:
M Butcher, Lorie Davis, L Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Anitra Lindley, Jeanette Harden, Kimberly Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
