Cases 71 - 80 of 11,321
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Tarrant County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Rodriguez
Defendant:
Tarrant County Sheriff's Office, Larry Cox and David Ukle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stanwyck v. City of Rhome et al
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marc Stanwyck
Defendant:
City of Rhome, Eric Debus, Carvan Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sessanga v. City of DeSoto et al
as 3:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Charles Sessanga
Defendant:
City of DeSoto and J. Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00953
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Copeland v. Nevarez et al
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Copeland
Defendant:
Jesus Nevarez, Jr, Judith Wells and Tarrant County (Family Courts)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wesco v. Chrysler Capital et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Monterio J Wesco
Defendant:
Chrysler Capital and Eli Weingarden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
