Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Smith v. Waltion et al
as 3:2013cv01557
Plaintiff:
Lee Smith
Defendant:
K Waltion, NFN Lewis, M Dixion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Davis, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv00839
Petitioner:
Steven Lynn Long
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv00025
Petitioner:
Luther Ben Long
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sierra v. Rocha et al
as 5:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Rufino Menera Sierra
Defendant:
NFN Rocha and S Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey et al v. Owen et al
as 4:2011cv00043
Plaintiff:
Fairada Dorsey, Agnes Brown, Charity Brown and others
Defendant:
Bronson Owen, Troy Sorria, Paul Yount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Board of Pardon and Parole of the State of Texas et al
as 4:2010cv00809
Plaintiff:
Barry E Livingston
Defendant:
Board of Pardon and Parole of the State of Texas, UP Old's, UP Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. McCrarey et al
as 2:2010cv00215
Petitioner:
Barry E Livingston
Respondent:
Robert McCrarey, UP Old's, UP Long and others
Defendant:
Board of Pardon and Parole of the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Long v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2010cv00179
Petitioner:
Lawrence M. Long
Respondent:
K. Edenfield, C. L. Richardson, C. Purco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Easley v. Cox et al
as 1:1994cv00171
Plaintiff:
Stacy Donnell Easley
Defendant:
C F Cox, John nmn Long, D Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Eric Richard Long
Defendant:
K. Edenfield, Harley G. Lappin, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
