Cases 11 - 20 of 372
Armenta v. Jacques, et al
as 5:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Michael Armenta
Defendant:
F.C.I. Sherdan, F.C.I. Sheridan, Warden FNU Jacques and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandvig v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv01319
Plaintiff:
Kurt Sandvig
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Brigette D Williams
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. BOP
as 4:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Smith
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugo v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2023cv00523
Petitioner:
Victor Lugo
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Said v. Moreno et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Islam Yaser-Ab Said
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Moreno, Dr. FNU Wheat, Dr. FNU Winger and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. Johnson County Sheriff et al
as 3:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent:
Johnson County Sheriff and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv01159
Petitioner:
Phillip McElroy and Phillip Samuel McElroy
Respondent:
United States of America, Freddy Garrido, Warden Garrido and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Norman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Alexis C Norman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Smith and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
