Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sparks v. Great Neck Saw Manufacturers, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
Russell Sparks
Defendant:
Great Neck Saw Manufacturers Inc, O'Reilly Automotive Inc and O'Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC doing business as O'Reilly Auto Parts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Symbology Innovations LLC v. McLaren Automotive Inc
as 3:2020cv03064
Defendant:
McLaren Automotive, Inc. and McLaren Automotive Inc
Plaintiff:
Symbology Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santander Consumer USA Inc v. Tate's Automotive Inc
as 3:2017cv01619
Plaintiff:
Santander Consumer USA Inc
Defendant:
Tate's Automotive Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Town North Automotive Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01215
Plaintiff:
Conor Moore
Defendant:
Town North Automotive Inc , Max Wedell , Scott Wedell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morrison v. Greig Automotive, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morrison
Defendant:
Greig Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dean v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
as 3:2010cv01348
Plaintiff:
Karen A. Dean
Defendant:
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2010cv00985
Plaintiff:
Brittne Wilson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company , TRW Automotive Holdings Corp , TRW Automotive Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
