Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hicks v. Toyota Financial Services
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E Hicks
Defendant:
Toyota Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Mason v. Toyota of Dallas
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Janet Mason
Defendant:
Toyota of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Mitchell v. Toyota of Dallas
as 3:2023cv01278
Plaintiff:
Rhonn Mitchell
Defendant:
Toyota of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Amason et al v DAG Fort Worth Motors, LLC
as 4:2022cv00310
Not Classified By Court:
DAG Fort Worth Motors, LLC d/b/a Toyota of Fort Worth
Plaintiff:
Ian Amason and Cassie Amason
Defendant:
DAG Fort Worth Motors, LLC doing business as Toyota of Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03244
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
