Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Nwakanma v. Novelli et al
as 4:2010cv01128
Plaintiff:
Bekee C Nwakanma
Defendant:
Karen Novelli, Lisa Howard , Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Woods v. Livingston, Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 4:2009cv03780
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wayne Woods
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeJesus v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 4:2009cv03484
Plaintiff:
Epifano DeJesus
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cox et al v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2008cv02758
Plaintiff:
Cecil C. Cox and Robert Earl Cox
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, University of Texas Medical Branch-Texas Department of Criminal Justice Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
