Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Brooks v. Paxton et al
as 4:2020cv01355
Defendant:
Sheila Jackson Lee, Judge Ernie Unknown, Greg Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wade Brooks, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Smith
as 4:2020cv00139
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Sheriff Royce Glenn Smith
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Dusenberry v. The United States of America, et al
as 4:2019cv04267
Plaintiff:
NELSON EDWARD DUSENBERRY
Defendant:
ROBERT THOMAS CHRISTIAN, MATT MILLS, NIN HULETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 4:2019cv04635
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Lvn Persinger, Anitra Lindsley, Jeffrey C. Matter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dugas v. The United States Of America et al
as 2:2019cv00302
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Dugas
Defendant:
David J. Bradley, The State Of Texas, Erick Echavarry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2019cv02041
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and State of Texas
Petitioner:
Carl Victor Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brady v. Ogg et al
as 4:2019cv01850
Respondent:
Harris County Sherif Ed Gonzalez, Ken Paxton, District Attorney Kim Ogg and others
Plaintiff:
Demond T. Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Acevedo et al
as 4:2019cv00934
Respondent:
Ken Paxton, Ed Gonzalez, Kim Ogg and others
Petitioner:
Antonio Q McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. Paxton et al
as 4:2019cv00896
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Barry Johnson, Ken Paxton and others
Plaintiff:
David Lee Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. State Board of Criminal Justice et al
as 2:2018cv00304
Defendant:
Governor of Texas Greg Abbott, State Board of Criminal Justice, Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas in his Official Capacity, Only and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Milan Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
