Cases 61 - 70 of 3,955
Robert Babuji vs. Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary U.S. Army
as 5:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Robert Babuji
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIA Network et al v. The City of Kerrville
as 5:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
LIA Network, Liberty In Action, Terri Hall and others
Defendant:
The City of Kerrville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanna v. Cangshan Cutlery Company
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR HANNA
Defendant:
CANGSHAN CUTLERY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Haynes v. Shonaz Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
Shonaz Foods, Inc. and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organization Act
Gregson v. City of San Marcos et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
John Gregson
Defendant:
City of San Marcos, Hays County, Officer John Reeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Balderas v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Balderas, Jr.
Defendant:
David Gonzales and Carlos Omar Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Kendall et al
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Arturo S. Lopez, Sr.
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III, Daniel Peterson, Anthony Scharf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Starr v. Hicks
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Carl Starr
Defendant:
Bill Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cantu et al v. Brennand et al
as 5:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Erik Cantu, Jr. and Emily Proulx
Defendant:
James Brennand and City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
