Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Brown v. Cartier et al
as 1:2013cv00246
Defendant:
Art Acevedo and James Cartier
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Federico Lorenzo Partida v. Reed et al
as 1:2012cv01074
Defendant:
Arturo Acevedo, Greg Hamilton, Detective Eric Hoduski and others
Plaintiff:
Federico Lorenzo Partida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00659
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00658
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sanchez et al v. Acevedo et al
as 1:2011cv00993
Defendant:
Art Acevedo, City of Austin, Sheryl Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Sanchez and Kristopher Sleeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luna v. Berry et al
as 1:2011cv00985
Defendant:
Art Acevedo, Justin Berry, City of Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Milan Luna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
K.D.C., et al v. Bowman et al
as 1:2011cv00973
Defendant:
Art Acevedo, Austin Police Department, James Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
K.M. Berron, Albert Contreras and K.D.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Torres et al
as 1:2010cv00110
Defendant:
Hubert Acevedo, Austin Police Department, City of Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00767
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
