Cases 131 - 140 of 249
Reed v. Leibovitz
as 1:2013cv02219
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
Lynn Leibovitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davenport v. Cook et al
as 2:2013cv04828
Plaintiff:
Andrew Davenport
Defendant:
Wayne Cook, Casey McVea, Bessie Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2013cv01579
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
M D Carvajal and Charles Samuels Jr, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wetzel v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2013cv04741
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
James LeBlanc
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wetzel v. Goodwin
as 2:2013cv03478
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Wetzel
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Gauthier et al
as 1:2013cv01263
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
M Gauthier, M D Carvajal and Merchant Debtors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harvey v. Cain et al
as 2:2013cv02994
Plaintiff:
Andrew Harvey, Jr.
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 2:2013cv02485
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Matthew D. Gamble, Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2013cv02487
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Matthew David Gamble, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00267
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Andrew Harvey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
