Cases 131 - 140 of 102,881
Wilson v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Demond Lamont Wilson
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop, Calvin Abor, FNU Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Joel Campbell
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans Jr. v. Lumpkin Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Texas- Tyler.
as 6:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coppola v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Coppola and Iron Thunderhorse
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia-Alvarado v. Rivers
as 4:2024cv00484
Petitioner:
Hector Irving Garcia-Alvarado
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Yannis v. FMC Springfield et al
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Victor Yannis
Defendant:
FMC Springfield and Travis Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mesa v. Humphrey
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Jesus M Mesa
Respondent:
C Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
County v. U.S. Judge Fred Biery et al Case electronically transferred to Western District of Texas- San Antonio.
as 4:2024cv01972
Plaintiff:
Olivia Denise County
Defendant:
U.S. Judge Fred Biery, Jamie Hurndon, Brenda Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
