Cases 11 - 20 of 167,446
Ramirez v. Warden, FCI Big Spring
as 1:2024cv00155
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Big Spring
Petitioner:
Armando Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Joseph v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02396
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Clarence Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02398
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Warren Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roblez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00221
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Kenneth Roblez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morriss v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00126
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Christopher Wayne Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palomo v. Rowe et al
as 5:2024cv00179
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Riddick, Judge FNU McLamore and Kelly Rowe
Plaintiff:
Crisanto Palomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Martin et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Defendant:
Nicholas C. Martin, Daniel V Pacheco and Victor R Gallegos, Jr
Plaintiff:
James Ward, Jr and Sinceria Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Warden, FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00390
Defendant:
T. Carter
Plaintiff:
Esteneslasio Luis Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Heath v. Hawley et al
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Terry Hawley, Brad Dorsey and Mike Renfro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
v. Bell et al
as 5:2024cv00142
Defendant:
Kody R. Schur, Mark Lyle Bell, Latresse N Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
