Miller Act Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 188
Frank's Paving Company, Inc. v. Herman Construction Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv01107
Plaintiff: United States of America, For Use and in Benefit of Frank's Paving Company, Inc. and Frank's Paving Company, Inc.
Defendant: Herman Construction Group, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Tandem Roofing, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02293
Not Classified By Court: SureTec Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Exposed Roof Design, LLC and United States of America
Defendant: Tandem Roofing, LLC, E&F Construction, A Joint Venture, Markel Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Western Surety Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02119
Plaintiff: United States of America and Industrial Roofing and Construction, LLC
Defendant: Western Surety Company and Pontchartrain Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and Benefit of Service Steel Warehouse Co LP v. Washington International Insurance Co et al
as 1:2023cv00126
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Service Steel Warehouse Co LP
Defendant: Washington International Insurance Co, Federal Constructors, Inc and Metroplex Fabrication & Erection, LLP
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of MMM Plumbing, Heating, and Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Sames, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of MMM Plumbing, Heating, and Air Conditioning, Inc.
Defendant: Sames, Inc. and Lexon Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. S/W Electrical, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc.
Defendant: S/W Electrical, LLC, Suretech Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Pacific Indemnity Company et al
as 7:2022cv00109
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit ofDiversified Interiors of Amarillo, LTD and The United States of America
Defendant: Pacific Indemnity Company, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States for the Use and Benefit of APAC-Tennessee, Inc. et al v. Riverside Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00535
Counter Defendant: United States for the Use and Benefit of APAC-Tennessee, Inc. and APAC-Tennessee, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Riverside Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant: Miller Materials, Inc. and The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Smith v. C3, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00907
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Anna Smith doing business as Brazos Valley Tile Installations and Anna Smith United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Anna Smith doing business as Brazos Valley Tile Installations
Defendant: C3, LLC doing business as Cueto Consulting and Construction, LLC, Andrew Cueto and Lexon Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Extraco Technology, LLC v. Sames, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Extraco Technology, LLC
Defendant: Sames, Inc., Lexon Insurance Company, Emergy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?