Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States for the Use and Benefit of APAC-Tennessee, Inc. et al v. Riverside Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00535
Counter Defendant:
United States for the Use and Benefit of APAC-Tennessee, Inc. and APAC-Tennessee, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Riverside Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Miller Materials, Inc. and The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Miller Masonry L L C v. Anthony and Gordon Construction Co Inc
as 5:2017cv01582
Plaintiff:
Miller Masonry L L C and USA
Defendant:
Anthony and Gordon Construction Co Inc, Chameleon Enterprises Inc and Great American Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Miller Masonry L L C v. Anthony and Gordon Construction Co Inc et al
as 5:2016cv01762
Plaintiff:
Miller Masonry L L C
Defendant:
Anthony and Gordon Construction Co Inc, Chameleon Enterprises Inc and Great American Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Viking Fence Company, Ltd. v. C. G. Miller Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00281
Defendant:
C. G. Miller Enterprises, LLC and Traveler's Casualty and Surety Company of America
Plaintiff:
Viking Fence Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Miller Masonry, Inc. v. Caddell Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01566
Defendant:
Caddell Construction Co., Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Plaintiff:
Miller Masonry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Woods et al v. ECC Operating Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00147
Plaintiff:
Todd H. Woods, Todd H. Woods, Todd H. Woods and others
Defendant:
ECC Operating Services, Inc., ECC Operating Services, Inc. and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Movant:
Patco Contractors Inc, Patco Contractors Inc and Patco Contractors Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
