Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Fannie Mae v. Huntington Creek Capital IV, LLC
as 4:2021cv02819
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
HUNTINGTON CREEK CAPITAL IV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Fannie Mae v. Capital Senior Living Properties 2 - Gramercy Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02395
Defendant:
CSL Middletown LLC, CSL Peachtree LLC, CSL Charlestown LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Receiver:
Receiver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fannie Mae v. Maxey Holdings, L.L.C., et al
as 15-20466
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FANNIE MAE
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD SELF
Fannie Mae v. Maxey Holdings, L.L.C.
as 15-20466
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Fannie Mae
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald Self
Fannie Mae v. Grahamcrest Apartments, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv02028
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Grahamcrest Apartments, LLC and Rui Azevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Fannie Mae v. Maxey Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv01558
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Maxey Holdings, LLC, Donald Self and Randall Crawford
Cross_claimant:
Randall Crawford
Cross_defendant:
Donald Self
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Fannie Mae v. Hondo Encinito Apartments, LLC
as 5:2013cv00425
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Receiver:
Paula Forshee
Defendant:
Hondo Encinito Apartments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fannie Mae v. Finch Crest Pinewood North Apartments, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv01174
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Finch Crest Pinewood North Apartments, LLC, Francis La Poll and Michael J. Adler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Fannie Mae v. 100 Hollow, LLC
as 4:2011cv04290
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
100 Hollow, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fannie Mae v. 200 Hollow, LLC
as 4:2011cv04071
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
200 Hollow, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
