Cases 71 - 76 of 76
Fowler, Rodriguez, Flint, Gray, McCoy, Sullivan & Carroll, L.L.P. v. Chian Spirit MaritimeEnterprises, Inc.
as 2:2007cv06379
Plaintiff:
Fowler, Rodriguez, Flint, Gray, McCoy, Sullivan & Carroll, L.L.P. and Fowler, Rodriguez, Flint, Gray, McCoy, Sullivan & Carroll, L.L.P.
Defendant:
Chian Spirit MaritimeEnterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fowler, Rodriguez, Flint, Gray, McCoy, Sullivan & Carroll, L.L.P. v. Bouchard Coastwise Management Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv05687
Plaintiff:
Fowler, Rodriguez, Flint, Gray, McCoy, Sullivan & Carroll, L.L.P.
Defendant:
Bouchard Coastwise Management Corporation and Bouchard Transportation Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ITT Educ Svc Inc v. Arce, et al
as 07-20438
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERTO ARCE, JESSE DELUNA, ALVIE LEE FULCHER and others
UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Sarma, S.A. et al
as 2:2007cv01086
Plaintiff:
UBS Financial Services Inc. and UBS Financial Services Inc.
Defendant:
Sarma, S.A., Sarma, S.A., Sarma, S.A. and others
Cross Claimant:
Sarma, S.A., Sarma, S.A., Sarma, S.A. and others
Cross Defendant:
Maria De Jesus Rios De Jaen and Silvia Elena Rodriguez Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
ITT Educational Services Inc v. ARCE et al
as 4:2007cv00204
Plaintiff:
ITT Educational Services Inc, ITT Educational Services Inc, ITT Educational Services Inc and others
Defendant:
Roberto Arce, Jesse DeLuna, Alvie Lee Fulcher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Home Buyers Warranty Corporation et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2007cv00018
Petitioner:
Home Buyers Warranty Corporation, Home Buyers Warranty Corporation, National Home Insurance Company and others
Respondent:
Hector Rodriguez and Yesenia Cano
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
