Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Serna v. City of Colorado Springs
as 24-50019
Plaintiff:
Francisco Serna and Ajhalei Snoddy
Defendant:
City of Colorado Springs, Federal Highway Agency, State of Colorado and others
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. 1.77 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY), 9.55 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, 0.05 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD EASEMENT A et al
as 3:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC
Defendant:
1.77 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY), 9.55 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, 0.05 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD EASEMENT A, Texas Reunion, LLLP, Boa Sorte Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Serna et al v. City of Colorado Springs et al
as 1:2021cv00939
Plaintiff:
Francisco Serna and Ajhalei Snoddy
Defendant:
City of Colorado Springs, Federal Highway Agency (FHWA), State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Marshall County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Marshall County, Mississippi, Nathaniel Lesueur, Bank of Holly Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Southeast Supply Header, LLC v. 80 acres in Lawrence County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00252
Plaintiff:
Southeast Supply Header, LLC, Southeast Supply Header, LLC, Southeast Supply Header, LLC and others
Defendant:
80 acres in Lawrence County, Mississippi, Roger Washington, Annie Kyles and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
