Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Heim v. ARAMARK Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv03494
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Heim
Defendant:
ARAMARK Services, Inc. , Occupational Safety Training Inc and ARAMARK U.S. Offshore Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Fincke v. Aramark Food Service Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01791
Plaintiff:
Eric Fincke
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service Corporation, Transocean Offshore Ventures, Inc., Transocean USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Mitchell v. Aramark et al
as 2:2012cv01265
Plaintiff:
Valencia Mitchell
Defendant:
Transocean Offshore USA, Inc., GlobalSantaFe Drilling Company and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Walter V. Micolta vs. Aramark US Offshore Services, LLC
as 3:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
Walter Villegas Micolta
Defendant:
Aramark US Offshore Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Camarillo v. Armark Corporation d/b/a Aramark US Offshore Division
as 3:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Camarillo
Defendant:
Aramark US Offshore Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Oliver v. SPARTAN OFFSHORE DRILLING, L.L.C. et al
as 6:2010cv01665
Defendant:
SPARTAN OFFSHORE DRILLING, L.L.C. and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
John Jeffrey Oliver
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Sheppard v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00401
Plaintiff:
Gary Sheppard and Gary Sheppard
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Noble Drilling Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Capozzi v. Atwood Oceanics Inc et al
as 6:2008cv00776
Plaintiff:
Albert Dominick Capozzi
Defendant:
Atwood Oceanics Inc and Aramark U S Offshore Services Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. ARAMARK Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00230
Plaintiff:
David Moore
Defendant:
ARAMARK Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
