Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lilly v. ARAMARK Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv17591
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lilly
Defendant:
Transocean Offshore Ventures, Inc., Transocean Offshore USA, Inc. and ARAMARK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Young v. Atwood Oceanics, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00609
Plaintiff:
Emma Young
Defendant:
Atwood Oceanics, Inc , Aramark Corporation and Aramark U.S. Offshore Services, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Andrews v. ARAMARK Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv02681
Plaintiff:
Cruz Andrews
Defendant:
ARAMARK Corporation , ARAMARK U.S. Offshore Services, LLC , Transocean Drilling (U.S.A.) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Calleja v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv05652
Plaintiff:
Ambrosio O. Calleja
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Heath v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv05268
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Transocean Offshore USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Doris Heath
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104 Marine Personal Injury
Mitchell v. Aramark et al
as 2:2012cv01265
Plaintiff:
Valencia Mitchell
Defendant:
Transocean Offshore USA, Inc., GlobalSantaFe Drilling Company and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Oliver v. SPARTAN OFFSHORE DRILLING, L.L.C. et al
as 6:2010cv01665
Defendant:
SPARTAN OFFSHORE DRILLING, L.L.C. and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
John Jeffrey Oliver
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Sheppard v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00401
Plaintiff:
Gary Sheppard and Gary Sheppard
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Noble Drilling Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Moore v. ARAMARK Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00230
Plaintiff:
David Moore
Defendant:
ARAMARK Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
