Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Regions Bank v. Central Mississippi, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Central Mississippi, Inc. and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cross_claimant:
Central Mississippi, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shirley Douglas v. Trustmark National Bank
as 12-60877
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHIRLEY DOUGLAS, Successor in interest of Schwartz & Associates, P.A. and Interstate Fire & Casualty Company
Defendant - Appellant:
REGIONS BANK
Hogan et al v. Regions Bank
as 2:2011cv01000
Plaintiff:
Suzette Hogan and Ann C. Sandberg
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Counter_claimant:
Regions Bank
Counter_defendant:
Suzette Hogan and Ann C. Sandberg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. Regions Bank
as 2:2011cv01002
Plaintiff:
Debra Miller
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Counter_claimant:
Regions Bank
Counter_defendant:
Debra Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reeves v. Regions Bank
as 2:2011cv01001
Plaintiff:
Jason Reeves
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Counter_claimant:
Regions Bank
Counter_defendant:
Jason Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Regions Bank ATM Fee Notice Litigation
as 2:2011md02202
Plaintiff:
In re: Regions Bank ATM Fee Notice Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Regions Bank
as 5:2010cv00140
Plaintiff:
Debra Miller
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reeves v. Regions Bank
as 2:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jason Reeves
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harmon et al v. Regions Bank
as 1:2008cv00019
Plaintiff:
Martha M. Harmon and James V. Harmon
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Clark et al v. Amsouth Bancorporation et al
as 3:2007cv00321
Plaintiff:
Riley F Clark and Marie H Clark
Defendant:
Penny W Hale, Penny W Hale, Regions Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
