Cases 1 - 10 of 3,642
Payton v. The City of Ridgeland, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Jumanda Payton
Defendant:
The City of Ridgeland, Mississippi, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Talley v. Mumford et al
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Roderick Greer Talley
Defendant:
Gerald Mumford, Judge Johnnie McDaniels, Judge Kenneth Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bauer v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ty K. Bauer
Defendant:
Kent Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brown
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, Sheriff Tyree Jones and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murrell v. Tucker et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Pamela Murrell
Defendant:
Lillian Tucker, Rodney Jones, Staci Akins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. City of Waveland, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Defendant:
City of Waveland, Mississippi, Joseph Joffrion and Williams Andress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Mask
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Bailey
Defendant:
Leo Mask, David Robertson, Ryan R Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disability Rights Mississippi v. Palmer Home for Children
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Mississippi
Defendant:
Palmer Home for Children
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Mack v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mack
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Ricky Davis, Brett McAlpin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bike v. Covetrus, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Eric Bike
Defendant:
Covetrus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
