Cases 121 - 130 of 41,909
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01502
Petitioner:
Everette Dale Webb
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington et al v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv00625
Petitioner:
Freddie Lee Washington, Jr, Tiuan J Moore and Avery S Boswell
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Campos v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
John Michael Campos
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Lumpkin DO NOT DOCKET. Case transferred to Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.
as 4:2024cv01466
Petitioner:
Antoine Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahoney v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Sierra Mahoney
Defendant:
Harris County, Harris County Sheriff's Office, Keep Separate Inmate Assailants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Dicky
as 4:2024cv01482
Petitioner:
JorCorey Deshawn McGee
Respondent:
Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joe Earl Smith
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Licon v. Sheriff of Ector County
as 7:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Jose Cruz Licon
Respondent:
Sheriff of Ector County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
