Cases 21 - 30 of 459
Peterson v. Ma'at
as 1:2022cv00139
Petitioner:
Gary Glenn Peterson
Respondent:
FNU Ma'at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Satchel v. Maddox
as 5:2022cv00232
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Satchel, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gonzales v. Maddox
as 5:2022cv00233
Petitioner:
Louis Fred Gonzales
Respondent:
Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gonzales v. United States
as 5:2022cv00225
Petitioner:
Louis Gonzales
Respondent:
United States and Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kirkman v. Lumpkin
as 22-20415
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gary Paul Kirkman
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cole Sr. v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02657
Petitioner:
Gary Anthony Cole Sr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Lumpkin
as 22-50666
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gary L. Kennedy
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Woods v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv02346
Petitioner:
Edward Neal Woods
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Gary W. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Westcott v. State of Texas
as 1:2022cv00628
Petitioner:
Gary K. Westcott
Respondent:
State of Texas and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00672
Petitioner:
Gary L. Kennedy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-ID Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
