Cases 21 - 30 of 295
Nolan v. Batesville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
William Kelly Nolan
Respondent:
Batesville Police Dept. and Panola Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boler v. Christopher
as 1:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Russell Boler
Defendant:
Kelly Christopher
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ragan v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00317
Petitioner:
Lonnie Gene Ragan
Respondent:
Kelly R. Metz and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mongeau v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Steven Gerard Mongeau
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wojtowicz v. Sheriff, Lubbock County
as 5:2023cv00023
Petitioner:
Donn Wojtowicz
Respondent:
Sheriff, Lubbock County and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bailey v. Rowe
as 5:2022cv00283
Petitioner:
Marlon Bailey
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Olivarez v. Rowe
as 5:2022cv00240
Petitioner:
Jai Olivarez
Defendant:
Lubbock County Courthouse, Lubbock County Detention Center and Sheriff Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brooks v. Kelly Rowe
as 5:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Darene Brooks
Defendant:
FNU 5:22-CV-221 Fair and Sergio Ordonez
Respondent:
Lubbock County Detention Center and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wilson v. Rowe
as 5:2022cv00194
Petitioner:
Edward J Wilson
Respondent:
Sheriff Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Strong
as 3:2022cv01391
Petitioner:
Jecole DeKeith Jackson
Respondent:
Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
