Cases 21 - 30 of 41,989
Nobles v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Dennis Germaine Nobles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Perez et al
as 6:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Roman J. Henry
Defendant:
Sergio Perez, Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Amaris v. FCI Big Spring Warden
as 1:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Evanan Jose Ramirez-Amaris
Respondent:
FCI Big Spring Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01425
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallman v. Waybourn
as 4:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Robert F Hallman
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
John v. Grant
as 3:2024cv00957
Petitioner:
Robert Charles John
Respondent:
NFN Grant, Warden and Dr S Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mosher v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Daniel Emmett Mosher
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parmer v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01412
Petitioner:
Robert B Parmer
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casterberry v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Anthony Lavelle Casterberry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucio v. Warden FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Anthony Herman Lucio
Respondent:
Warden FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
