Cases 31 - 40 of 4,367
Cain v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv01075
Petitioner:
William Clint Cain
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cain v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv01025
Petitioner:
William Clint Cain
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00505
Petitioner:
William Dexter White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Permenter v. Stephens
as 1:2022cv00500
Petitioner:
William M Permenter
Respondent:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv01156
Petitioner:
Dennis Williams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hornsby v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00177
Petitioner:
James William Hornsby
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02403
Petitioner:
William Thomas Carey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02405
Petitioner:
William Thomas Carey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillan v. Williams
as 1:2022cv00143
Petitioner:
Khanief McMillan
Respondent:
Bryan Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Summerville v. Collier
as 3:2022cv02150
Petitioner:
William Joseph Summerville
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
