Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Lampley v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Erick Anthony Lampley
Respondent:
Gene Miller and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Sheriff - Shelby County Jail
as 9:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Dalton Grant Miller
Respondent:
Sheriff - Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
Benjamin Miller
Respondent:
Lubbock County Sheriff and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Foster v. Miller
as 3:2023cv02263
Petitioner:
Ronald Dwayne Foster
Respondent:
G Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Salmonson
as 5:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Daniel Miller
Respondent:
Warden Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Deleon v. Miller
as 5:2022cv00251
Petitioner:
Rocky Deleon
Respondent:
Michael R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Miller
as 5:2022cv00109
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent:
NFN Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Lumpkin
as 3:2022cv00202
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent:
Warden Miller and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Gonzales
as 4:2022cv01429
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Chiro Miller
Respondent:
Ed Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miller v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv00738
Petitioner:
Joshua A Miller
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
