Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Nunez v. Enge
as 3:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
Victor Gabriel Nunez
Respondent:
Jamadre L Enge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nunez v. Warden
as 6:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Victor Gabriel Nunez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Salas v. Waybboun
as 4:2023cv01254
Petitioner:
Gabriel Salas
Respondent:
Sheriff Bill Waybboun and Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salas v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv01001
Petitioner:
Gabriel Salas
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rios v. Mason
as 5:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
John Gabriel Rios
Respondent:
Wanda Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Razo-Elizarraras v. Warden, FCC Beaumont Medium
as 1:2023cv00254
Petitioner:
Gabriel Razo-Elizarraras
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rios v. Lubbock County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 5:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
John Gabriel Rios
Respondent:
Lubbock County Sheriff's Office, Lynn County Sheriff's Office, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gabriel v. USA
as 4:2023cv00652
Petitioner:
Paredes Curiel Gabriel
Respondent:
USA and Warden, FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rios v. Lynn County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
John Gabriel Rios
Respondent:
Lynn County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salas v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Gabriel Salas
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
