Cases 1 - 10 of 114
McGruder v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv00514
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, John Doe Superintendant and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ira Elijah McGruder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deundra Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Jackson, Security Warden Unknown Andrews, Chief Unknown Perry and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carroll v. Mississippi Dept. of Corr. Records Dept.
as 3:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Wiley Zachary Carroll
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. of Corr. Records Dept. and Superintendent John Hunt
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berryman v. Huffman
as 23-60627
Petitioner:
Brian Scott Berryman
Respondent:
Brand Huffman, Superintendent
Willis v. McClure
as 3:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Rayfield LeRoy Willis
Defendant:
Superintendent M. McClure
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Cain
as 23-60384
Petitioner / Appellant:
Billy Carol Anderson, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Brand Huffman, Superintendent, Brand Huffman and Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Amerson v. McClure et al
as 4:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Defendant:
Superintendent Marc McClure and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanders v. Huffman
as 23-60331
Petitioner / Appellant:
Chad R. Sanders
Respondent / Appellee:
Brand Huffman, Superintendent
Winding v. McClure
as 23-60252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James C. Winding
Defendant / Appellee:
Marc McClure, Superintendent and Raymond Roberts, Warden, Mississippi State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
