Cases 91 - 100 of 39,827
Bullock v. Hockley County Jail
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bullock
Defendant:
Hockley County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Nueces County Jail
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant:
Nueces County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Welch, Jr.
as 9:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hall
Defendant:
Thomas H. Welch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chambers v. SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dontriel Chambers
Defendant:
SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Grimes v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
John A Grimes
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farr, Sr. v. Ponthler et al
as 9:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Willie Ned Farr, Sr.
Defendant:
Courtney Tracy Ponthler, Robert J. Burby, Jessie C. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montemayor v. Parker
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Frank Montemayor
Defendant:
Stan Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. Fannin County Sheriff and Police Officers, et al.
as 4:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Houston Samuel Hammons
Defendant:
Fannin County Sheriff and Police Officers, Fannin Co TX and State of TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiner v. Parole Board Austin Texas
as 6:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Defendant:
Parole Board Austin Texas, Henry LNU and Christi Agulair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfford v. Ernestine
as 9:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
Julye Ernestine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
