Cases 11 - 20 of 158
Albright v. Holiday Unit et al
as 1:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Albright
Defendant:
Holiday Unit, Clemens Unit and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dumkwu et al
as 6:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Mongo J Williams
Defendant:
Anthony Dumkwu, Asst Warden John Ragsdale, Capt Christopher Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Lone
as 9:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
David Bradley Byrd
Defendant:
W. Johnny Lone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Lone
as 6:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
David Bradley Byrd
Defendant:
W. Johnny Lone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Vega et al
as 6:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bradley Young
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Vega, FNU Decker, FNU Mitchel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calton v. Bradley et al
as 5:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Allen F. Calton
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Bradley and Victoria E. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Bradley, Clerk, et al.
as 5:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Lowell Q. Green
Defendant:
David J. Bradley, Clerk, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coby v. Court of Criminal Appeals et al
as 1:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Alferis Coby
Defendant:
Court of Criminal Appeals, Kim Ogg, Commissioners Court of Harris County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Bowen v. Denton County Jail
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Bradley Bowen
Defendant:
Denton County Jail, State of Texas, Denton County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Applewhite Hass v. Ramsey et al.
as 6:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Wendy Lea Applewhite Hass
Defendant:
Will Ramsey and Martin Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
