Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Demos et al v. Alexis et al
as 1:2014cv00589
Defendant:
Aaron Alexis and Bass Pro Shops
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Judd et al
as 1:2014cv00590
Defendant:
Frederick Banks, Keith Russell Judd, Amanda Levy and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis et al v. Danzig et al
as 1:2014cv00534
Defendant:
Austin Police Dept. and Glenn Danzig
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Roman Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Putin et al
as 1:2014cv00535
Defendant:
Shamil Basayev, Aleksandr Kerensky, Tsar Nicholas LNU and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Roman Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis al v. Judd et al
as 1:2014cv00538
Defendant:
Frederick Banks, Keith Russell Judd, Amanda Levy and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Roman Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Putin et al
as 1:2014cv00591
Defendant:
Shamil Basayev, Aleksandr Kerensky, Tsar Nicholas LNU and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis et al v. Alexis et al
as 1:2014cv00537
Defendant:
Aaron Alexis and Bass Pro Shops
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Roman Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Danzig et al
as 1:2014cv00592
Defendant:
Austin Police Dept. and Glenn Danzig
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driscoll v. Hudspeth et al
as 4:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
John Robert Driscoll
Respondent:
Monty Hudspeth , Tawana Smith and Susan Dostal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Demos, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 13-60231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
