Cases 71 - 80 of 321
Young v. Polk et al
as 5:2020cv00087
Plaintiff:
Steven Damien Young
Defendant:
Michael Bates, Ralston D Marshall and Balden O Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00157
Defendant:
Anthony Patrick, Ranlon Collin, Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
David Lee Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen et al v. The Bureau of Prisons of the United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv00062
Plaintiff:
Rusty Leisure, Allen Miles, David White and others
Defendant:
The Bureau of Prisons of the United States of America and Warden S. Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v Davis, et al
as 3:2020cv00032
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis, Anthony Patrick, Unidentified Agents and others
Plaintiff:
David Lee Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welsh v. Lubbock County et al
as 5:2019cv00255
Defendant:
Ron Jenkins, Lubbock County, FNU Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Jr. v. Guevera et al
as 2:2019cv00356
Defendant:
Ray Guevera and Philip J. Sifuentes
Plaintiff:
Kerry Young Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dusenberry v. The United States of America, et al
as 4:2019cv04267
Plaintiff:
NELSON EDWARD DUSENBERRY
Defendant:
ROBERT THOMAS CHRISTIAN, MATT MILLS, NIN HULETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove-Thomas v. Young et al
as 5:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Alfreda D. Carreon, William P. Clements Unit, Brittany S. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Jamel Hargrove-Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. TDCJ
as 4:2019cv03825
Defendant:
TDCJ
Plaintiff:
Jesse Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrade v. Amarillo Police Department and Police Officers et al
as 2:2019cv00152
Defendant:
Potter County Sheriff Department an Staff, Nancy Esparza, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Valdez Andrade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
