Cases 81 - 90 of 9,891
Watkins v. Semmes et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Khristopher Watkins
Defendant:
Danny Semmes, Edwardo Mendoza, Clarence Cormier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorehart v. Frith
as 6:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bruce Moorehart
Defendant:
Kirk Frith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broussard v. Strength et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Neil Patrick Broussard
Defendant:
Bryan Strength, Correctional Officer and Correctional Deputy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sepulvado v. Thomas et al
as 5:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Steven Dean Sepulvado, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Thomas, Berlin Sweet, Jesse W Branam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogbebor v. Hardy et al
as 6:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Edosa Addley Festus Ogbebor
Defendant:
Kenneth Hardy, Tyler Daigle, Jacob Ortego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. Francis et al
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sterling
Defendant:
Joseph Francis and Chris Lambert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Miya v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Kerry Salas De La Miya
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aikens v. Federal Public Defenders Office
as 6:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Aikens
Defendant:
Federal Public Defenders and Federal Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennon v. Security Management L L C et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tony Cordell Kennon
Defendant:
Security Management L L C and Chris Stintson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deville v. Sieveking et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
John Deville, Jr
Defendant:
Johnny Sieveking, Kobe Lacombe, Jordan Santoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
